‘The Discovery of France: A Historical Geography from the Revolution to the First World War’
by Graham Robb
Norton, 454 pp., $27.95
Most of us have a reasonably clear sense of France and its history. Invaded by the Romans and ruled by a series of royal families, France was rocked by a bloody Revolution, ruled by an emperor named Napoleon and made home to the Eiffel Tower, ultimately becoming the classic tourist destination (before the Euro made it too expensive to visit). But this modern conception of France is not only incomplete, but fundamentally misconceived.
Almost everything that makes France “French” is a more or less modern invention. French as a language, for starters, was not widely spoken throughout France itself until well after the French Revolution. Instead, peasants throughout the countryside spoke a hodgepodge of differing languages and dialects. Even in the late 1700s, a traveler leaving the city limits of Paris typically required a translator to be understood and, farther south, would have difficulty even identifying the language he or she was hearing. Indeed, just over 100 years ago, French was a foreign language to nearly 80 percent of the population.
Graham Robb, a historian and author of several acclaimed biographies, provides a ground-level historical geography of France from the Revolution through the First World War. An avid bicycle rider, Robb researched the book by riding more than 14,000 miles throughout France and spending four years in the library. What he discovered was how little of what one might consider “France” existed only a couple of centuries ago.
Indeed, authorities didn’t even attempt to map the country until the mid-18th century. Even then, the cartographers encountered stiff hostility from villagers suspicious of “foreigners” with strange devices.
Large parts of France weren’t even part of the country until relatively recently. Brittany, for example, didn’t become part of France until 1532, when Queen Anne of Brittany married into the Royal family and brought the Celtic province as her dowry. France, similarly, didn’t acquire Alsace and Lorraine until the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648. Nice and Savoy didn’t become part of France until 1860. As Robb notes, “the propaganda of French national unity has been broadcast continuously since the Revolution, and it takes a while to notice that the tribal divisions of France were almost totally unrelated to administrative boundaries.”
The Revolution, together with the introduction of modern transportation and communication systems, brought enormous pressures to bear on provincial culture. In the provinces, being “patriotic” or “educated” often meant denigrating one’s own culture, language and customs.
Little of what once existed survives to this day. On the marsh lands of southwest France, shepherds on 10-foot stilts once covered dozens of miles of heath in a day. Deserts covered portions of the interior. Seasonal migrations of masons and other skilled workers traveled the footpaths toward Paris and employment. Highly trained dogs in the north smuggled goods to evade taxes.
With much of the country transformed by modern agriculture, the French language imposed from above and modern transportation leaving villages to collapse into neglect, many of the curiosities of ancient France simply vanished into the slipstream of history.
Robb’s book offers a glimpse into that forgotten past, from evidence found at bike level in obscure corners of the country most of us are unlikely to visit. And for that meticulous research, he deserves a standing ovation. He could, however, have benefited greatly from a strong editor with an ample supply of red pencils, as the book suffers from occasional numbing detail, arcane asides and a less-than-transparent organization. But for those in search of a remembrance of things past, to paraphrase Proust, this is a priceless glimpse into history.
Category: Reviews
-
A French connection built from reading, riding, researching
-
‘Death in the Pot: The Impact of Food Poisoning on History’
‘Death in the Pot: The Impact of Food Poisoning on History’
by Morton Satin
Prometheus Books, 262 pp., $24
Food provides far more than nourishment. It defines culture, builds empires, feeds armies and, with equal potency, can destroy all that it built. Poisoned or spoiled food has profoundly influenced the course of human history. From the Peloponnesian War (likely lost by Athens at least in part as a result of contaminated or spoiled cereal stocks) to the death of Beethoven (lead poisoning), food poisoning has changed history in significant and memorable ways.
In “Death In The Pot,” Morton Satin, a molecular biologist and technical director at the Salt Institute, provides an interesting and quirky survey of the baneful impact of adulterated food supplies on history. Illnesses from contaminated foods through the middle ages were typically attributed to heavenly retribution for Earthly misconduct or blasphemy. In fact, however, the more likely cause was poorly maintained food supplies.
Hallucinogenic symptoms of moldy grain in early American colonies were considered by Puritan settlers to be signs of witchcraft. Even today, E. coli outbreaks make the most innocent-looking hamburger seem like a lurking menace, and once seemingly healthy seafood can in fact be loaded with food dye or threatening levels of mercury. It’s a sad day when the “fish on Friday” rule requires a blood test for toxicity.
Satin’s effort could have provided a springboard for a thoughtful survey of food safety throughout history, or perhaps proposals to avoid threats to the food supply, topics with urgent relevance to our own times. Unfortunately, though, Satin’s work fails to live up to its promise. It is poorly written, often stitching together short essays on discreet topics with abrupt transitions. But more fundamentally, much of the research seems incomplete or inconclusive.
Of course, forensic analysis hundreds, or thousands, of years after the fact must necessarily depend on a certain degree of speculation. But even with respect to more recent events (E. coli outbreaks, or intentional food contamination in the 1970s), Satin seems content to rely on information that is readily available rather than engage in any sort of serious analysis. As food for thought, “Death In The Pot” is meager gruel. -
U.S. Supreme Court: A history of the hows and whys
Republicans have won five of the past seven presidential elections, a conservative tide that swept through the re-election of George W. Bush in 2004. Yet until recently the Supreme Court remained curiously centrist, with even seemingly conservative nominees yielding to more moderate positions.
In “The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court” (Doubleday, 369 pp., $27.95), CNN senior legal analyst and New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin provides a history of the modern Supreme Court and the impact of its changing composition. Based on interviews with the justices, the book provides a fascinating inside look at the most secretive branch of government. Toobin writes beautifully, and the book is impossible to put down.
Toobin steps through the confirmation battles of the 1980s and 1990s, from Robert Bork’s failed nomination (as a result of his incendiary writings) to the soap-operalike confirmation hearings over Clarence Thomas. It seems almost quaint to remember a time when a nominee could be rejected for being too conservative.
The most arresting portion of the book, however, is its discussion of the court’s infamous 5-4 intervention in the 2000 presidential election, in Bush v. Gore. The court’s veneer of political independence was stripped away by the ill-concealed enthusiasm with which the court intervened. Justice David Souter, who dissented, was so disgusted that he considered resigning. As Toobin writes, Souter viewed his colleagues’ actions as “so transparent, so crudely partisan that Souter thought he might not be able to serve with them any more.”
The irony of the intervention is striking. Conservative activists long have insisted on restraint from federal interference with state power. Yet no area is more firmly committed to the states by the Constitution than the “time, place, and manner” of state and federal elections. Every state has a process for recounts, for determining voter intent, and, ultimately, for contesting the outcome. Disputed elections are not uncommon in history; federal intervention is.
Yet that is precisely what the court did in Bush v. Gore, leading to widespread disrespect for the court and what Toobin and others, including many constitutional lawyers, have characterized as its hasty, poorly reasoned opinion. Toobin calls the decision “one of the lowest moments in the court’s history.”
Washington state could have shown the way. The 2004 gubernatorial election was stunningly close, with Christine Gregoire edging out Dino Rossi by only 129 votes out of 2 million cast. Instead of federal intervention, Rossi’s election contest proceeded under state law, with a full trial after which the court definitively rejected Rossi’s challenge. (Full disclosure: I represented the Washington state Democrats in that trial).
The Supreme Court’s intervention in the 2000 presidential election caused years of widespread questions over the legitimacy of the election . By contrast, after a full hearing on the 2004 gubernatorial election, Gregoire took office without the same sort of pervasive legitimacy questions .
Toobin carefully chronicles the vacancies filled by President Bush in the past two years and the window those nominations have on the ascendant power of “movement conservatives.”
From the outset of the Reagan revolution, steadfastly conservative lawyers formed the influential Federalist Society to promote conservative political values in the judiciary, including expansion of executive branch powers, relaxation of the separation between church and state, and intent to overturn the Roe v. Wade abortion decision. After watching “conservative” appointees such as David Souter and Anthony Kennedy turn centrist, these activists made sure they didn’t repeat the mistake.
Indeed, the surprise nomination of White House Counsel Harriet Miers failed precisely because she was insufficiently conservative for the conservative elite. With John Roberts (who replaced Chief Justice William Rehnquist), whose name appeared in Federalist Society membership lists, and Samuel Alito (who replaced Justice Sandra Day O’Connor), a longtime Federalist Society member with proven conservative credentials, no such questions exist. And, as Toobin’s concluding chapters on the 2006-07 term note, they have delivered with a vengeance.
Over the long run, America gets the Supreme Court it deserves. Having elected conservative administrations for 20 of the past 28 years, the only real surprise is how long it took for the court to definitively turn right. -
Rendering judgment on an infamous trial in ‘Sacco & Vanzetti’
‘Sacco & Vanzetti: The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind’
by Bruce Watson
Viking, 448 pp., $25.95
Few criminal trials in American history have left such a record of recrimination and finger-pointing as the infamous trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti.
Sacco and Vanzetti, two Italian immigrants, were charged with the murder of two payroll clerks on April 15, 1920, in Braintree, Mass. The brazen daylight murder took place only steps away from busy factories filled with hundreds of potential witnesses. The gunmen shot the clerks, collected the payroll cash, and then roared away in a large black sedan with white window drapes fluttering amid the billowing dust. Less than three weeks later, Sacco, an edge trimmer in a shoe factory, and Vanzetti, a fish peddler, were charged with the murders.
Both were carrying fully loaded pistols when arrested and neither provided fully plausible explanations for what they were doing that evening. They were, admittedly, anarchists who supported a shadowy movement intent on destabilizing the United States. But the evidence against them was weak and the trial an embarrassment.
Curiously, the trial occurred at a time with compelling similarities to the modern day. Then, as now, there was widespread fear of terrorism – and with good reason. Anarchists (we would call them “terrorists” today) regularly bombed public squares and subway stations.
Similarly, like today, conservative hostility toward immigration was rising, leading Congress in 1924, with the support of the Ku Klux Klan and the American Legion, to slash immigration quotas. Although it seems nearly unimaginable now, the tide of anti-Italian fever was running high in America in the 1920s, with fears of Italian gangsters and uncontrolled violence convulsing the country.
It is difficult to imagine a context less suited for a dispassionate, fair trial. And few would describe the resulting trial as either “dispassionate” or “fair.”
In “Sacco & Vanzetti: The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind,” Bruce Watson does a terrific job of reviewing the historical record of the trial, drawing compelling portraits of the principals, their families, and partisans on both sides of the bitter controversy. Drawing on untapped legal archives, this is the first full-length study of the case in over 30 years. It was worth the wait.
Judge Webster Thayer, a stern New England reactionary, presided over the trial with barely concealed hostility. Sacco and Vanzetti were defended by Fred Moore, a flamboyant California lawyer oblivious to his irritating effect on the judge.
The defendants were convicted on July 14, 1921, but the case lingered for more than six years while appeals and pleas for clemency ran their course. As Justice William O. Douglas commented decades later, anyone reading the trial transcript would “have difficulty believing that the trial with which it deals took place in the United States.”
After Thayer denied the defendants’ motion for a new trial, he commented to a friend at a Dartmouth football game, “Did you see what I did with those anarchistic bastards the other day?”
Tanks and Marines defended American embassies abroad as hundreds of thousands marched in protest in every major world capital. As Watson notes, the trial was freighted with much larger implications: “In the judgment of the world, one American city would stand for America itself, one court case for the universal dream of fairness, two men for all men staring into the naked face of power.”
Sacco and Vanzetti were executed on Aug. 23, 1927. Over 100,000 people streamed through the funeral home after the execution to pay their respects.
For 80 years, the acrimonious table-pounding debate has continued over the case. Watson’s careful study is unlikely to definitively settle that dispute, but does provide a welcome clear-eyed overview of one of the most disappointing chapters in American judicial history. -
Judge Dwyer’s speeches bring legend to life
“Ipse Dixit: How the World Looks to a Federal Judge” by William L. Dwyer should be required reading for every new lawyer admitted to the Washington State Bar Association.
Judge Dwyer was a legend both as a trial lawyer and as a federal judge in Seattle. He was appointed by President Reagan as a U.S. District Court judge. Although his appointment was delayed for more than a year over concerns raised by conservative senators, he won confirmation and served from 1987 to 2002. From major league baseball, to the timber wars over the spotted owl, to federal term limits, Judge Dwyer was at the center of many of the most important controversies of the past 30 years.
In the months before his death in 2002, Judge Dwyer compiled this collection of speeches he delivered during his years as a federal judge and even wrote the preface for “Ipse Dixit” (University of Washington, 176 pp., $24). The title is Latin for “he himself said it,” typically used for unsupported assertions. He originally collected these materials for his grandchildren, and it was his widow, Vasiliki Dwyer, who brought them forward for publication. Like reading a long-delayed letter from an old friend, it’s a wistful experience to read the preface, followed by a series of thoughtful essays.
The 15 speeches included in this volume span the years 1978-2002. Judge Dwyer addresses, with wit and insight, topics ranging from international law to lawyer professionalism, his self-effacing humor on vivid display throughout. Accepting an award in 1992 to the prestigious “Order of the Coif,” typically an honor bestowed on the brightest law students, he commented, “to those of the class of 1952 who made Order of the Coif the hard way, and who might think this award is unjust, I can only point out that you have had a handsome certificate on your wall for forty years in a spot where I have had to make do with an old photograph of a fishing trip.”
Judge Dwyer was also an outstanding trial lawyer who took pride in his work and saw lawyers as an essential part of a democracy, critical to the preservation of liberty in a free society.
His 1993 speech to the Federal Bar Association on ethics in the practice of law is a careful, logical call to the practical value of civility and the debasing effects of extremism in the courtroom. He called it one of the “basic truths” of law practice: “that the best rewards come to those who are not just capable but ethical.”
Judge Dwyer’s long-standing ties to the Northwest and to Seattle are evident throughout the collection. His fond memories of hiking through the North Cascades and involvement in some of the most significant cases of the past 40 years – first as a lawyer and later as a judge – are sprinkled throughout the book.
In 1998, Judge Dwyer took senior status, a form of semi-retirement for federal judges. In his speech to the Federal Bar Association that evening, he recalled his warm reception from the bar after he was (finally) confirmed, then observed: “Tonight’s greeting seems even warmer. I can only assume that the bar is even happier about my departure than it was about my arrival.” Nothing could be further from the truth.
In 2002, only months before the judge died, his daughter Joanna delivered Judge Dwyer’s last speech, on his behalf, on the value of pro bono legal work for the poor – legal services provided free of charge to those without the means to pay. It’s a fitting end piece for the collection, touching not only on the role of legal services in the cause of justice but also on the critical contributions of lawyers, in big firms and small, to filling that need.
Meade Emory, a University of Washington law professor, saw the project through to completion, contributing explanatory end notes, a warm remembrance in the foreword, and an interesting compilation of articles written by and about Judge Dwyer. Stimson Bullitt contributed a foreword for his close friend.
Inspiring, thoughtful and beautiful, this collection of essays is a gem. -
A home in Rome: Travel memoir is good enough to eat
“Four Seasons in Rome: On Twins, Insomnia, and the Biggest Funeral in the History of the World”
Anthony Doerr
Scribner, 224 pp., $24)
Anthony Doerr is a lucky man. Returning from the Boise hospital where Shauna, his wife, had just given birth to twin boys, he opens the mail to find that he has won a prestigious award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters providing him with an apartment in Rome for a year, a studio in which to write anything he wishes, and a living stipend to help pay for it all.
Most people would consider dealing with newborn twins to be more than enough of a challenge for a year. Moving to a foreign country, even one as warm, familiar and welcoming to young families as Italy, would be a daunting challenge all by itself. To move to a foreign country with infant twins would strike most as nearly suicidal.
But Doerr and his young family do exactly that, and “Four Seasons in Rome: On Twins, Insomnia, and the Biggest Funeral in the History of the World” (Scribner, 224 pp., $24) is his memoir of his year abroad, wandering through Rome’s vibrant streets and learning doorpost-by-doorpost Italian language, history and culture. Doerr, a Boise author who has received numerous awards for his writing, including the O. Henry Prize (twice) and the Outstanding Book of 2003 Award from the American Library Foundation, is the author of “The Shell Collector” and “About Grace.”
Doerr’s writing is warm, colorful and flowing, and his day-by-day memoir brings the essence of Rome alive. Those incredible tomatoes, buttery yet simple sauces, freshly baked focaccia bread, and the smell of roasting pork waft through the pages of this book. To anyone who has spent time in Italy with young children, it only takes a few chapters to bring back to life every smiling little old Italian woman insisting in pinching cheeks and pronouncing “belissima!” To those who have never visited, the book is an introduction to the enrapturing power of Italian food, people and culture.
Of course, travel memoirs cram most bookstore shelves, stacked in drifts as the summer months approach. “A Year in Provence” has spawned a virtual industry of my-year-abroad travelogues. It doesn’t take long to tire of the entire self-serving genre.
But this thin volume skirts the pitfalls that plague so many similar volumes. Doerr’s writing, for one, is rich, vivid and almost worth the effort regardless of the topic. Unlike others who spend weeks, or even months, visiting Italy and return sprinkling their language with Italian, and imagining themselves part Italian, Doerr has no such pretensions. “I know nothing. I lived in Rome four seasons. I never made it through the gates between myself and the Italians. I cannot claim to have become, in even the smallest manner, Roman.” Yet he perceptively describes the cultural differences, at once familiar, fascinating and yet unknowable for most Americans, and the astonishingly transformative power of living abroad and outside of the blaring 24/7 media whirlwind that dominates modern American life.
Doerr, like most new parents, is overwrought about the burdens of new parenthood, and it’s difficult to avoid rolling one’s eyes at his overly dramatic accounts of colic, sleepless nights and crying babies. Similarly, he exaggerates the challenges of navigating an Italian grocery store or communicating everyday needs without speaking Italian. Yes, it can be a challenge, but Rome is hardly a small town, Italian food and culture are hardly unknown to Americans, and English is, like a slow-moving plague, common throughout most of Italy and certainly throughout Rome.
But the sheer warmth and obvious sincerity of Doerr’s writing is enough to overcome these minor obstacles. This book, like a long trip through a warm Italian night, is richly rewarding and well worth the effort. -
‘Out of Africa’ and into his own biography
‘Too Close to the Sun: The Audacious Life and Times of Denys Finch Hatton’
by Sara Wheeler
Random House, 292 pp., $27.95
Denys Finch Hatton lived life on his own terms. Tall and handsome, with a devilishly crooked smile, he was famously irresistible to women and equally unable to commit to any of them. Born into money and the English aristocracy, he refused to conform and instead fled England for the then-largely untracked British East Africa (now Kenya).
His exploits in the African bush would likely have long ago faded into obscurity but for his good fortune to have had affairs with two much more interesting women who, as it turns out, were great writers and chose to immortalize him in “Out of Africa” (Karen Blixen, under the pen name Isak Dinesen) and “West with the Night” (Beryl Markham).
In “Too Close to the Sun,” British author Sara Wheeler laboriously details Finch Hatton’s life and times. He attended Eaton and Oxford, but without enthusiasm (except for golf) and left behind a decidedly mediocre academic record. Rather than conform to the demands of his position or the expectations of British society, he fled instead to British East Africa. He invested in various farming enterprises and devoted most of his time to exploring the Kenyan jungle, ultimately serving as a jungle guide for a variety of wealthy clients.
Finch Hatton secured his place in history through his relationships with Blixen and Markham. Blixen, divorced from an unfaithful spouse, struggled to establish a coffee plantation in the Kenyan bush, “at the foot of the Ngong Hills” as she famously described it in “Out of Africa.” Although Finch Hatton lived with her, he simultaneously had a romantic relationship with Markham, a much younger woman who had been raised on the African plains by her father. Curiously, both women produced critically acclaimed autobiographies featuring, in part, their liaisons with Finch Hatton.
Blixen’s coffee plantation finally failed in 1931, forcing her to leave her cherished Africa. Shortly before Blixen’s tormented departure, Finch Hatton died in a fiery small plane crash in the African bush. Blixen returned to her native Denmark brokenhearted and poured her heart into her writing, producing not only “Out of Africa” but a variety of short stories, including “Babette’s Feast.” She was twice nominated for the Pulitzer Prize.
It is difficult to imagine anyone working up the enthusiasm to devote a full-length biography to Finch Hatton had he not already been featured in two outstanding autobiographies, not to mention a Hollywood movie. But, of course, writing a biography with that sort of competition would be difficult for even the best of writers.
Wheeler’s writing, unfortunately, has all the romance, thrill and excitement of a high-school chemistry textbook. Worse, the book is littered with elliptical historical references, long chapters on Finch Hatton’s genealogy, and random footnotes to insignificant historical controversies over events in his life.
This nearly impenetrable thicket of prose might be worth it if either the subject was worth the effort or the writing even remotely approached the lyricism of either of Finch Hatton’s lovers’ autobiographies. The book, unfortunately, fails on both accounts. -
A surfeit of bad news in Seattle
‘Damage Control’
by Robert Dugoni
Warner, 406 pp., $24.99
Bad news, they say, comes in threes. That’s certainly true for Dana Hill, a talented young lawyer at a prestigious Seattle law firm, who juggles a young daughter who needs her attention, a demanding and arrogant boss and a self-absorbed husband. But for Hill, the star of “Damage Control,” the new murder mystery from Seattle author Robert Dugoni, those challenges are the least of it. She is diagnosed with breast cancer just as she discovers her husband is having an affair. Worse, her brother is found brutally murdered, the apparent victim of a burglary gone wrong.
Rather than wallow in self-pity, Hill instead throws herself into investigating the murder. Hill’s investigation parallels the announcement of the presidential ambitions of Washington Sen. Robert Meyers. A Democratic candidate with chiseled good looks and a stunningly beautiful wife at his side, seeking a “Return to Camelot,” Meyers has a hidden dark side.
It’s not hard to foresee the inevitable collision of these two storylines. Before long, Hill comes face to snout with Meyers and justice is served on several levels.
Dugoni’s first novel, “The Jury Master,” was a terrific debut. “Damage Control,” unfortunately, offers little of the same. The book is set in Seattle with a vengeance. Seattle is not just background scenery but almost a subplot of the novel, with detailed descriptions of every bridge, island and overpass. This is boosterism run amok; it’s hard to imagine a book set elsewhere would bother with all the local geography.
More fundamentally, the novel is predictable and filled with cartoonish characters. Meyers’ good looks/beautiful wife/Kennedyesque style is achingly stereotypical, and he is so plainly the villain that he all but sports a waxed mustache from the moment he struts on stage. The novel similarly suffers from over-the-top mysticism in the form of an implausible shamanlike jewelry designer who helps Hill solve the murder. For a writer of Dugoni’s talent, the novel is a disappointing encore. -
‘Monkey Girl’ | An ‘intelligent design’ legal battle dissected
‘Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion and the Battle for America’s Soul’
by Edward Humes
Ecco, 380 pp., $25.95
In Dover, Pa., shortly after the 2004 election, the school board adopted a policy, over the vehement objections of its science teachers, requiring that students be told that evolution is “just a theory” and that alternative scientific explanations exist, including “intelligent design,” a thinly veiled version of creationism. Predictably, the decision was enormously controversial and led to the filing of a lawsuit seeking to invalidate the policy. Far from being dismayed by the litigation, the school board welcomed it and, with volunteer lawyers from a fundamentalist Christian law firm, saw it as an opportunity to validate the teaching of creationism.
Fortunately for the teaching of science, and the separation of church and state, it didn’t turn out that way.
In “Monkey Girl,” Pulitzer Prize-winning author Edward Humes tells the riveting story of how a sleepy Pennsylvania town became the focus for the biggest fight over the teaching of evolution in the public schools since the Scopes Monkey Trial itself. Humes does a terrific job of evenhandedly laying out the history of creationism in America and the 150-year history of intense hostility from Biblical literalists to Darwin’s theory of evolution, virtually the entire field of modern biology, and even the scientific method itself. (Many Christians, of course, find no such inconsistency between Christianity and evolution).
Dover’s embrace of “intelligent design” was encouraged by the Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based group that pugnaciously defends the teaching of creationism. The institute crafted an ingenious political “wedge strategy” by boldly asserting that a legitimate controversy exists over evolution, then demanding that schools “teach the controversy” by presenting “both sides” of the debate. What could be wrong with that? Of course, there is no legitimate scientific debate over the basic premise of evolution – it is the very foundation of modern biology, paleontology, and genetics and is amply supported by more than 150 years of scientific research. But the call for including “both sides” was alluring for school board members utterly unfamiliar with either biology or “intelligent design.”
The trial lasted six weeks and was an utter rout of the school board and its ill-conceived policy. Although the board denied their obvious religious motivation, or even using the word “creationism,” the record dramatically undercut them. School board member Bill Buckingham, for example, during board deliberations responded to objections about injecting religion into the classroom by declaring: “Two thousand years ago, someone died on a cross. Can’t someone take a stand now?” Later he commented that “This country was founded on Christianity, and our students should be taught as such.” Though he denied making the statements during the trial, other board members and reporters all confirmed his comments.
By the trial’s end it was clear that “intelligent design” had no foundation in science. Even one of the board’s experts was forced to admit that “intelligent design” could be considered “science” only if one redefined science to include astrology, magic and other supernatural beliefs.
The judge – a Republican appointed by President George W. Bush – was unconvinced by the board’s effort to defend the policy. In fact, he was outraged by the charade, rejecting the board’s policy as unconstitutional and finding that two of the board members had lied under oath. He called the board’s effort “breathtaking inanity.”
Nor were the board members any more successful with the public: The entire pro-“intelligent design” school board was voted out of office.
Humes carefully steps through both the science at the core of the debate and the legal machinations, without getting lost in the detail on either front. His writing is vivid, memorable and engaging, and a welcome breath of common sense in an area dominated by zealots and table pounding. -
A thundering legal thriller
‘The Jury Master’
by Robert Dugoni
Warner, 438 pp., $24.95
John Grisham, move over. With his debut courtroom thriller, “The Jury Master,” Seattle author Robert Dugoni explodes from the tired pack of Grisham wannabes with a riveting tale of murder, treachery and skullduggery at the highest levels.
David Sloane is an extraordinary San Francisco trial lawyer, with an unbroken string of courtroom victories that astonishes even Sloane himself, as he gets even obviously guilty clients acquitted against all odds. Tormented by recurring nightmares, however, Sloane is plainly troubled emotionally. His life is turned upside down when his home is ransacked.
More than 3,000 miles away, Tom Molina, a West Virginia police detective, investigates what appears at first to be a relatively obvious suicide in a national park. But things get more complicated when a high-handed assistant United States attorney reveals that the dead man is Joe Branick, a close friend of Robert Peak, the U.S. president, and demands control over the investigation. Suspecting something more sinister than a suicide, Molina refuses and soon learns that his suspicions are well-founded.
These seemingly unconnected events coalesce when Sloane, reading the headlines, realizes that Branick had attempted to contact him in the last few hours of his life and had mailed him a package. Sloane’s realization that the package and the break-in may be connected is underscored as events hurtle forward with the brutal murder of Sloane’s elderly neighbor, leaving Sloane, a former Marine, stunned and on the run.
The president, meanwhile, is dealing with plummeting approval ratings, the apparent suicide of his friend and an emerging oil deal with Mexico to help secure greater independence from Middle Eastern oil – as well as a related threat on his life from underground guerilla groups in Mexico.
Of course, nothing is as simple as it seems. Innocent people die, trained military operatives take on both Molina and Sloane, and a 30-year-old conspiracy all converge at breakneck speed. The tale sweeps to a dramatic conclusion in the same national park where it all started, where Sloane learns the reasons for his recurring nightmares, the president’s fears are realized and justice is, ultimately, served.
It’s a great story that fairly thunders along from start to finish, and a terrific debut. Dugoni, a Seattle lawyer who retired from the practice of law in 1999 to concentrate on his writing, has previously published “The Cyanide Canary,” a nonfiction account of an environmental litigation similar to Jonathan Harr’s “A Civil Action.”
Of course, saying that this potboiler rivals Grisham is a rather vicious case of damning with faint praise. Like Grisham, Dugoni doesn’t even try to comment on larger issues, and the political context woven into the background is both laughably simplistic and curiously out of date. A Marxist guerrilla group is involved; when was the last time a Marxist guerrilla group served as anything but the punch line of a joke or a historical footnote? Dugoni, moreover, cuts back and forth from scene to scene, almost as if written for a particularly disjointed episode of the popular television show “24.” Then, again, with royalties for syndication rights being what they are, perhaps that’s precisely what Dugoni intended.
But, in all fairness, this is a debut novel and Grisham’s first one was no award winner, either. Dugoni has a flair for developing an engaging plot, with memorable characters, and keeping things moving like an overcaffeinated barista. For an opening salvo, it’s hard to ask for more.